It is quite sobering to see the numbers depicted in a graphic manner. :shudders:
Here's another one:
And no, these graphs don't take inflation into account... but, simply comparing the deficit between Clinton's presidency and Bush's. Inflation hasn't been so great in the past 10 years that those numbers would be terribly different. But, they are frightening.
Don't do that, you'd miss your computer. I do understand the temptation. Throw the hammer towards the white house instead, maybe you'll hit someone worth hitting.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:00 am (UTC)It's not the highest if you take inflation into account.
Still kinda high, though.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:03 am (UTC)we were headed up up up, then texis boie took over.
=P
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 08:41 am (UTC);o)
come visit tommy!
I promise I'll keep the scary liberals away from you...
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:27 am (UTC)Here's another one:
And no, these graphs don't take inflation into account... but, simply comparing the deficit between Clinton's presidency and Bush's. Inflation hasn't been so great in the past 10 years that those numbers would be terribly different. But, they are frightening.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:30 am (UTC)course we have to grant that clinton had the dotcom boom to help him out, but still.
sheit.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 08:22 am (UTC)